Review: Hero 100 Classic

In the pen world, there is a very fine line between a design that is “inspired by” the designs of other pens and those that are clearly meant to serve as an outright copy of a design. There are, after all, only so many differences you can inject into an object as ostensibly simple as a fountain pen before you turn it into something else altogether.

Chinese manufacturer, Hero, is a long-lived, prolific, and generally well-regarded manufacturer of fountain pens. As a brand, however, they are fairly well-known for skating (or sometimes long-jumping over) this line. This can be seen with the previously reviewed Hero 9315, with which Hero appropriated the shape and pattern of a Parker Sonnet, including going to far as to duplicate Parker’s trademark arrow-shaped clip.


The Hero 100 Classic Series fountain pen is another example of them “borrowing” design inspiration; although in this case, they appear to have stayed on the “inspired by” side of the line. The Hero 100 is remarkably similar to one of the most popular fountain pens of all time, the venerable Parker 51. However, instead of a straight-up copy, they do make some adjustments to the design to give the Hero 100 its own look and feel. Due to these small differences, and the fact that the Parker 51 on which it is based is no longer in production, makes the Hero 100 feel much less derivative.


Made entirely of a brushed steel, the Hero 100 is topped by a faux “jewel” which has been machined into the seamless material of the cap. Hero avoids copying the Parker arrow clip this time, opting instead for a chrome-colored metal clip with a slim, streamlined profile. This hinged clip is both attractive and rather solid. The cap flares out slightly and ends in a thin edge onto which are engraved some Chinese characters (one assumes this is the brand’s name) and the number 100. On the back side are the English words “Made in China”. The rest of the barrel is without any additional decoration save for another machined faux jewel at the end of the pen.


The pull-off cap is friction-fit and feels nicely secure. When removed, it reveals a black plastic section that is an exact copy of the Parker’s section. The section flows smoothly into the barrel without threads or a step-down, allowing for a comfortable grip regardless of how you like to hold your pen. The section then tapers down to a narrow point which hoods all but a tiny, exposed point of a nib. (I consider this a fountain pen for people who want to trick everyone else into thinking they’re using a ballpoint pen.) The nib itself is said to be made of 14k gold, but there are no visible hallmarks on the hooded nib, so it’s hard to know for sure. There is not an easy way to remove the nib from the section as the pen’s various pieces have been glued together.


The barrel unscrews from the section and reveals a large, integrated aerometric-style filling system which, again, is firmly attached and cannot be easily removed. (It would have been nice if, while they were tweaking the design of the Parker 51, they had “improved” the pen to include a standard international cartridge and converter, but alas, they stuck with the aerometric filler.) The filling system consists of a metal sleeve inside which is attached a clear silicone sac. The sac is compressed by pressing down on a small metal bar accessible through a hole in the wall of the converter. I rather loathe aerometric fillers, and this one is particularly poor. Depressing the pressure bar several times only ever gets the sac to half full. Ink tends to pool up toward the back of the sac, impeding ink flow to the nib. And with a non-removable aerometric converter, cleaning this pen is a right pain. It’s like someone took all the world’s filling systems, picked the worst characteristics of all of them, and combined them to make Aerometric fillers.


The hooded fine nib on the Hero 100 that I reviewed is not a bad nib. It is smooth with a hint of nice feedback. It is well adjusted to a nice, moderate wetness. In the hand, the pen is comfortable and nicely balanced, whether posted or not. (I particularly like using this pen posted.) The hooded nib does tend to exacerbate my personal tendency to roll the pen as I write. Fortunately, the shape of the nib tip is such that the pen remains capable of writing even when I do roll the pen. I’m not entirely sure how they managed it, but this pen has a nice, wide sweet spot.

As nice as the nib is, however, it is hindered nearly to the point of un-usability by the feed and/or converter. This particular pen has one of the worst cases of ink starvation syndrome I’ve ever seen in a pen. After half a page of writing, the ink flow would slow significantly, before stopping entirely. The aerometric style of converter also makes this pen particularly difficult to prime without spilling ink all over the place. In the end, I found myself having to whip the tip of the pen about to get ink to the tip of the pen and start it writing again. This wasn’t an issue when I was writing outside on my patio; inside, though, I had to wrap the pen in a cloth or paper towel before whipping it about like I was conducting Beethoven’s 5th. Only then could I get it writing again, which it would do for another half a page. The faster I wrote, the worse the problem became. This problem was particularly disheartening in light of how well the Parker 51 on which the Hero 100 is based, would write. It seems that one of the features they did not copy was the rock-solid feed system and ink flow.

Regarding ink flow, the pen also had one other issue that I found particularly irksome: this thing dried out extremely quickly. One of the points of a hooded nib is to expose less of the nib and feed to the air to allow the pen to stay wetter longer. However, if I let the pen stop writing uncapped for 30 seconds, the ink would stop flowing entirely. Even when I capped the pen, if I didn’t start writing again in 10-15 minutes, the nib would dry up and I found myself having to conduct Mussorgsky’s Night on Bald Mountain again before I could resume writing. I understand that fountain pen ink is water-based, and will dry out eventually, but the issue was so rapid and so persistent on the review model of the Hero 100 it made the pen difficult to use.

Despite these problems, I did find this to be a decent pen to use as a knockabout pen. The metal body makes the pen feel solid, the cap and the clip were secure, and the pull-off cap and fine line of the nib meant that I could whip it out to use it for a quick note on lower-quality paper, or to check off items from my shopping list. For a couple of weeks, I was using it tucked into my Traveller’s Journal as I did my daily bullet point planning. Had it not been with the ink flow issues I experienced, this pen might have taken up a permanent place tucked into the leather of that notebook.

You can find the Hero 100 for sale from Chinese eBay sellers for around $25USD. If you are lucky enough to get one without ink flow problems, then that is really quite a good price, especially if the nib is, as advertised, 14k gold. I have seen the pen for sale from stateside retailers for around $65, which starts to feel a little on the high side, especially since you can get a real Parker 51 in fully-working condition for around that price (so long as you don’t care about the color.)

My experience with many of these low-cost “inspired by” pens is that one will be a great pen, while the next one coming off the assembly line will barely function. (Removing any sort of serious quality control process is a great way to lower production costs.) I, for instance, really liked my Hero 9315 I reviewed—especially after replacing the #5-sized nib. So, while I can’t necessarily recommend the Hero 100 based upon my experience with the pen if you do decide to give it a try, there is a chance that what you’ll get is actually a very nice pen. Just be aware that there’s also a possibility it could come with some serious issues.

Material: Steel
Nib: Fine 14k Gold
Appointments: Steel
Filling System: Aerometric
Length (Capped): 139mm
Length (Uncapped): 125.3mm
Length (Posted): 145.7mm
Section Diameter: 10mm
Barrel Max Diameter: 11.2mm
Cap Max Diameter: 11.9mm
Weight, Capped (with ink and/or converter): 21g
Weight, Uncapped (with ink and/or converter): 14g

The pen for this review was provided free of charge by a Pen Habit viewer. No additional compensation was provided. All opinions expressed herein are my own. 

  • Kevin Guo

    Great review Matt! You’re spot on with all your observations. Hero 100s all have great jobs but the filling system is just a pain. The drying out is a pretty consistent problem, though somewhat better on versions that are not all metal. I did a slight engineering mod on my personal Hero 100s to make them take a Lamy converter, but it was very tedious work.

    I’m extremely honored that you took the time to review my childhood first pen!

  • Kevin Guo

    Great review Matt! You’re spot on with all your observations: good nib (consistently good), fast dry out (consistently drying out fast…), a section that’s not for everyone, and a filling system I dislike. On my pens I did an engineering mod to make the pen take a Lamy converter, but it took a lot of thinking and tools so highly not recommended…
    The nib is hall marked 14k once you disassemble it but again disassembling basically starts with melting the glue seal…

    I’m extremely honored that you reviewed my childhood first pen! It’s far from the best pen in the world but my grandfather used it when he was in university in the 50s, my father used it in uni in the 80s, and by now it’s more heritage than utility.

  • Lez Cartwright

    Hiya Matt, liked the review. The music halfway through surprised me a little but it was a nice composition, I like the Pen Habit music its pleasant to listen to.
    The point you made about copying stuff, copyright and stealing others intellect creations, completely agree with you, its totally wrong.
    Ive got an old Parker51 with a stub nib that was presented to my dad for working at one company for ages and it is okay to write with, comfortable.
    The studio layout has improved with no reflections that were noticeable, is there any chance of a walk around sometime now youve made changes and show us the tech if you do so, the 4K thingie.
    I just dont know how you find the time to do the currently inked and the reviews, surely glad you do mind and again thank you for your obsession.
    Dont know how the Chinese make the pans so cheap, Jinhao is a pen I like which is inexpensive which leads me to the point about feeds as these can be less that good as well… In a recent project converting a Jinhao to a flex pen I found the numbers on the feed nibs bear a significance in that the feeds are different diameters. The number 5 wouldnt fit my replacement nib where the number 8 fitted perfectly, I feel the Hero will be the same but you cant pull it to bits to compare. The point, depending where the Hero is bought may affect the writing experience.
    Thanks again for the review and the opportunity to comment on things.
    Best wishes as always.

  • alex mood

    I really wanted to love to this pen. It is my ideal pen, utilitarian and with a hooded nib, so that I don’t have to keep capping and uncapping the pen for brief note taking. But my experience was that it just stopped writing after half a page. What a shame.

  • Timothy Zajdela

    Hi Matt,
    just providing some context here. The predecessor of the Hero 100 was the 100 Hero (those creative name choices), a pen commissioned by the Chinese Government with a clear goal: to make the best utilitarian pen possible. Then in 1963, they switched over to the Hero 100 name. The body is injection molded plastic, similar to that of a Parker 51, and much higher quality than that of a Hero 616. The design is very reminiscent of the Parker 61. The nib is indeed 14k gold and is hallmarked at its base on post 2002 ones and not hallmarked on older ones. The internal parts aren’t glued together, they are screwed, it is simply that you need a special tool: this is very practical because replacement parts are easy to find and cheap. It seems like you might have gotten either a fake or a bad one, but at 35 dollars from reputable seller who will check them for you, it is an absolute steal.
    It also happens to be the most collectable chinese pen, as there are several very rare colors and models, up to and including sterling silver, solid gold and grey. There are also countless custom parts for it, including a demonstrator piston filler.
    The pre 2002 ones used a much better plastic in that while it feels the same, it doesn’t crack nearly as readily. Some were also 12k instead of 14k.

  • kcwookie

    I have two Hero 100s and they both work well. The pen is very dependent on the ink. I used Cross Blue/Black and got pretty good results. The better the ink is lubricated, the better the results. I used a variety of inks in the pen, and yes it is a challenge to clean, but then again so are my Parker 51s and 21s. I finally got some Hero ink and that has been the worst ink yet for the pen. It is worse than Sheaffer. The only pens I’ve got good results from Sheaffer are Sheaffer pens.

    I love Hero pens, and this is one of my favorites, although my absolute favorite is the 329 old design, not the new one being sold. Thank you for the review.

  • Frank Dong

    Sorry to say that, but as a Chinese pen lover who have used dozens of Hero 100, I think you may have probably bought and reviewed a fake 100…
    The most siginificant evidence is the design of the section, as you can see from this picture:

  • waterside

    I always enjoyed your review. Here are something to add:

    1.Hero is the most well-known fountain pen brand in China (not one of the most well-known, but the most well-known). As a Chinese, I never heard of Jinhao before watching your reviews, but every single member of my family owns a Hero. I believe there were billions of Hero 616 produced in the past decades. Many kids in my generation learned how to write using a Hero fountain pen.

    2. As someone has brought up on Youtube, Hero had the permission to use the Parker 51 design. There was even a movie made in the 1940s on how they made this series following Parker 51. Please do not assume design theft before checking out the background stories. I am not sure about the copyright situation during the communist ages (Yes we are ruled by capitalists now! ;D ) Now the design patent has expired, so that no longer matters.

    3. From writing experience per se, I think Hero 100 and some better QC-ed 616 write as good as or even better than the original Parker 51. I own several vintage Parker 51, but my choice of everyday writing has always been Hero 100. The problems such as ink starvation you described in the video never appeared on my authentic Hero 100, not even on my Hero 616 models.

    4. Nowadays an authentic Hero 100 costs AT LEAST 40USD. In Hero’s official store on Taobao, its regular model (the one in review)’s price is currently 430RMB (65USD). So even in China, you buy one at 65 rather than 25. Since you got one lower than 30, I would say it’s almost certainly a forgery or factory second. I think that explains the performance of the “Hero 100” in this video.